Audi RS 3 Sedan
Sedan · Gasoline · AWD
vs
BMW 520i
Sedan · Gasoline · FWD
Audi RS 3 Sedan
Car A
Audi RS 3 Sedan
The Audi RS 3 Sedan mixes compact family-car usability with serious pace, posting 0–100 km/h in 3.8 s from a 400 hp AWD setup. It’s winter-capable and quick, but the 280 L trunk and 10.9 L/100 km consumption curb practicality and efficiency.
5 seatsSedanGasoline5-star safety400 hpAWD
BMW 520i
Car B
BMW 520i
The BMW 520i is an efficient five-seat saloon that suits road trips and growing families. Its balanced performance and 530 L boot make it good value in its segment.
5 seatsSedanGasoline5-star safety6 L/100km
Why compared cross brandsame body typesame powertrainsame seatssimilar price

Usage fit

Family 58 / 63
City 41 / 37
Budget / value 51 / 54
Road trip 51 / 64
Performance 41 / 33
Cargo 15 / 29
Practical 37 / 46
Premium 55 / 57
Winter 66 / 30

Scores out of 100. Blue = Audi RS 3 Sedan · Orange = BMW 520i

Specs side-by-side

Spec Audi RS 3 Sedan BMW 520i
Values are representative — confirm for your market and trim.

Pros & cons

Audi RS 3 Sedan

  • Explosive acceleration (0–100 km/h in 3.8 s) for confident passing and on-ramps
  • AWD traction for winter driving and year-round grip
  • Seats five in a compact sedan footprint that’s easy to park
  • Good value in its segment given 400 hp performance at this price

BMW 520i

  • Efficient for its class at 6 L/100 km, ideal for long-distance driving
  • 530 L trunk handles family luggage for holidays and weekends
  • Adequate pace for highways (184 hp, 0–100 km/h in 7.9 s, 235 km/h top speed)
  • At about 55,000, it represents good value in its segment

Verdict

Pick Audi RS 3 Sedan if…
Efficiency & everyday ease
Audi RS 3 Sedan is the choice if fuel economy and city-friendly driving are your priority.
Pick BMW 520i if…
Performance & capability
BMW 520i is the choice if you want more power, speed, or all-weather capability.

Related comparisons