Audi A7 55 TFSI quattro
Sedan · Gasoline · AWD
vs
BMW M550i xDrive
Sedan · Gasoline · AWD
Audi A7 55 TFSI quattro
Car A
Audi A7 55 TFSI quattro
The A7 55 TFSI quattro combines a strong V6 and AWD poise to favor long-distance driving. It suits road trips and growing families more than tight-city or cargo-heavy use.
5 seatsSedanGasoline5-star safety8.5 L/100kmAWD
BMW M550i xDrive
Car B
BMW M550i xDrive
A premium AWD saloon that pairs very quick acceleration with real everyday space, the M550i xDrive shines on fast, long-distance journeys. Higher fuel use and premium pricing make it less compelling for city-heavy or budget-led use.
5 seatsSedanGasoline5-star safety530 hpAWD
Why compared more powercomparison picksame body typesame powertrainsame ranking profilesame seats

Usage fit

Family 64 / 62
City 30 / 26
Budget / value 44 / 36
Road trip 69 / 68
Performance 41 / 47
Cargo 30 / 29
Practical 43 / 39
Premium 63 / 69
Winter 70 / 70

Scores out of 100. Blue = Audi A7 55 TFSI quattro · Orange = BMW M550i xDrive

Specs side-by-side

Spec Audi A7 55 TFSI quattro BMW M550i xDrive
Values are representative — confirm for your market and trim.

Pros & cons

Audi A7 55 TFSI quattro

  • 340 hp V6 with 500 Nm and 5.3 s 0–100 km/h delivers confident performance
  • AWD traction enhances stability in winter and wet conditions
  • 535 L trunk and five seats support family travel and road trips
  • Combined 8.5 L/100 km is efficient for its class

BMW M550i xDrive

  • Very strong performance for its class (530 hp, 0–100 km/h in 3.8 s).
  • AWD traction supports winter and mixed-weather driving.
  • Five seats and a 530 L boot suit growing families and road trips.
  • Well suited to premium buyers who prioritize fast, long-distance travel.

Verdict

Pick Audi A7 55 TFSI quattro if…
Best fuel economy
Audi A7 55 TFSI quattro uses 8.5 L/100km vs 10.5 — a meaningful saving if you cover high mileage.
Pick BMW M550i xDrive if…
More power
BMW M550i xDrive puts out 530 hp vs 340 — meaningfully quicker and more confident on motorways.

Related comparisons